Adewale Adeyemo, President Joe Biden’s nominee for deputy treasury secretary, said he is open to continuing unilateral sanctions against China but stressed that he prefers multilateral sanctions and closer coordination with allies. Adeyemo also said he plans to conduct a “top-to-bottom” review of the agency’s sanctions procedures (see 2101190060) and examine whether the U.S.’s foreign investment screening tools should be strengthened.

The Biden administration has a range of pressing trade- and sanctions-related issues to address in the Middle East, including charting a path to restoring the Iranian nuclear deal, ensuring sanctions are not hindering humanitarian aid and recruiting Middle East allies to counter Chinese technology competition, experts said.

A judge with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas declined to allow the state of Texas to voluntarily drop a civil forfeiture lawsuit over goods seized by a local law enforcement group that aims to stop illegal exports. The state will continue litigation in a similar case in front of the same court. The federal government isn't a party in either case.

A Commerce Department rule designed to cut off U.S. shipments to foreign military intelligence agencies in China, Russia and beyond could create a host of due-diligence issues for exporters, industry lawyers said. Those issues could be compounded by industry uncertainty surrounding the scope of the rule, which may be unclear without BIS guidance. “We're getting an enormous number of questions,” said Giovanna Cinelli, an export control lawyer with Morgan Lewis. “I think the rule is open to interpretation, and that’s creating uncertainty.”

Sen. Tom Cotton, one of the most prominent China hawks in Congress, thinks that the Bureau of Industry and Security is buried within an organization “hostile to the aggressive use of export controls,” and so it should be moved from the Commerce Department to the State Department, because, he says, that department puts national security first. Cotton, who has published a lengthy report on what he calls the economic long war with China, discussed his views during an online program at the Reagan Presidential Foundation on Feb. 18.

The European Union won’t hesitate to push back on U.S. extraterritorial sanctions but wants to work more closely with the Biden administration on sanctions programs to ease compliance burdens for EU companies, a top EU official said. “There is no better way to protect against extraterritorial sanctions than to align sanctions implementation with partners like the United States,” said Mairead McGuinness, an EU commissioner overseeing financial markets.

Although national security lawyers aren’t expecting many changes to the goals of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. under the Biden administration (see 2101220034), they are expecting more of an effort by CFIUS to keep its transactions and actions out of the spotlight. “We do expect to see a return to a normal course of business for CFIUS, for the deliberations to take place behind closed doors,” said Caroline Brown, a trade lawyer with Crowell & Moring, speaking during a Feb. 17 event hosted by the law firm.

The semiconductor, chemicals, medical devices and aviation industries could be especially hurt by decoupling, according to a new U.S. Chamber of Commerce report attempting to quantify the costs of stopping or slowing sales to China, and in the case of chemicals, high tariffs on Chinese inputs used by U.S. chemical plants. Some of the actions modeled in the report have already happened, such as 25% tariffs on chemicals from China, and China's retaliatory tariffs on chemical exports. But while semiconductor exports to ZTE, Huawei and Fujian Jinhua have been restricted, there has not been a complete ban on the export of chips to China, which is what the report modeled.

Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories for Feb. 8-12 in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching on the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.

The U.S. needs to swiftly implement industrial policies to counter China’s technology rise and compete against Chinese state-owned companies or risk lagging behind in innovation, experts said. Without targeted policies, the U.S. could quickly cede technology leadership to China in a variety of sectors, the experts said during a Feb. 16 Center for Strategic and International Studies event.