FCC Tells DC Circuit It Won't Conclude 2018 QR Before 2022 QR Version

The FCC doesn’t plan to conclude the 2022 quadrennial review before finishing the 2018 iteration, the agency said Monday in an opposition filing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The FCC “has no intention of combining the Quadrennial Reviews for 2018 and 2022; nor does it plan to allow the 2022 review to ‘cut in front of’ the 2018 review,” the filing said. The FCC “plans to complete the 2018 review of its ownership rules before it concludes its independent 2022 review of the rules,” said the agency. “If NAB’s sole purpose in seeking mandamus is to prevent the FCC from combining the 2018 and 2022 reviews, mandamus is not necessary to achieve that outcome.” The agency was responding to NAB’s mandamus request that the court force the agency to issue a 2018 QR, which NAB filed after the FCC sought comment on the 2022 QR without concluding the previous iteration (see 2307070057). The FCC’s failure to conclude the 2018 QR is “by no measure egregious,” considering the multiyear litigation against the original 2018 QR order that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, said the agency. The SCOTUS decision upholding the FCC was issued in 2021, and the FCC had to refresh the record after the ruling, the agency said. That record refresh drew “almost 1000 pages of new comments and attachments,” and ended less than two years ago, the FCC said. QR proceedings are often contentious and complicated, and the agency has only four commissioners, the filing said. “For the past twenty years, each of the Commission’s orders completing Section 202(h) review has been approved by a 3-2 vote, with two Commissioners issuing lengthy dissenting statements,” the FCC said. NAB is “mistaken” in asserting that QRs are meant to be both started and completed every four years, the FCC said. “Congress did not identify a specific deadline for commission action,” the filing said. “NAB’s claims that the Commission has unduly delayed completion of past Quadrennial Reviews is irrelevant to its claim in this case that there has been undue delay in the 2018 Quadrennial Review,” the filing said. Granting NAB’s mandamus request “would intrude on the FCC’s discretion to order its priorities,” the FCC said. “The FCC is saying, somewhat ironically, if the NAB quits suing us we could finish media ownership, but we shouldn't be made to have to do it,” said University of Minnesota professor Christopher Terry. He said however the agency resolves the two QRs, the matter is likely to lead to further litigation.