‘Stakes Enormous’ in SCOTUS Consideration of Section 230 Cases

When the Supreme Court takes up two related Communications Decency Act Section 230 cases this term, “the questions will be difficult and the stakes enormous,” said Miller Nash partner Robert Cumbow in an analysis Monday. Many over the past quarter century have credited Section 230 “with enabling the internet to grow and flourish,” said Cumbow. But others say that “reconsideration of the reach of Section 230 is long overdue,” he said. Legal experts told us earlier this month that SCOTUS will almost undoubtedly recast or cut back the broad immunity that interactive online platforms enjoy via the Section 230 liability shield (see 2210110030). Cumbow said that waiting in the wings is the pending 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals case of Hepp v. Facebook, in which a misappropriated photograph of Philadelphia news anchor Karen Hepp found its way into numerous ads that appeared on Facebook and other online platforms, promoting such products as dating services and sexual performance enhancement. Plaintiff Hepp claims Facebook “is liable for violating her publicity rights because Section 230 expressly excludes intellectual property claims,” he said. Many states, including Hepp’s home state of Pennsylvania, “regard publicity rights as intellectual property, leading the Fourth Circuit to hold that Facebook is not shielded from Hepp’s claims” via Section 230, he said. Hepp and the two related social media cases all maintain that under the current interpretation of Section 230 they “will have no redress for wrongs committed against them and perpetuated by the companies that control web platforms,” said Cumbow.