Jackson Says Congress Generally Can’t Regulate Viewpoints

Government regulation “along viewpoint lines” is “generally impermissible” under the First Amendment, Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday (see 2203210067). Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, asked Jackson if it’s within Congress’ authority to condition Communications Decency Act Section 230 immunity on online public forums not discriminating against certain viewpoints. “I can’t comment on a particular issue” about whether it’s constitutional, she said. The criteria depend on whether the government is seeking to regulate along viewpoint lines, which is “generally impermissible” under the First Amendment, she said. Concerning antitrust law, there’s a lot of precedent for the Supreme Court to consider, Jackson told Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn. Antitrust laws protect competition, consumers, competitors and the economy, and the Sherman and Clayton acts have broad protections, said Jackson. If confirmed, she said, she would look at precedent to ensure legislation is interpreted to reflect Congress’ intent. The text of the statute is what the court uses to interpret, Jackson said. Tech and telecom issues largely didn’t come up during Jackson’s second confirmation hearing of the week.