US Should Resist Expanding ITU Areas of Influence, CTA, Others Tell NTIA

The U.S. should “reaffirm its commitment to voluntary global standards that are open and that facilitate the interoperability of communications and information devices and apps,” CTA asked NTIA as the U.S. prepares for ITU’s 2020 World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly. Others said the U.S. should oppose any push to expand ITU work, in comments posted Tuesday. ITU shouldn’t “duplicate, replace, or interfere with existing efforts, particularly with respect to issues outside the ITU’s core mission,” CTA said. “The consumer technology marketplace is innovative and competitive here and worldwide," the group said: “The current voluntary global standards process reflects this competitive environment by promoting innovation and flexibility while providing for interoperability and security.” Oppose a “new IP” proposal before WTSA, the Telecommunications Industry Association said. Proponents Huawei and the Chinese government say the proposal “promises to provide better support for heterogeneous networks that more efficiently combine satellite and terrestrial signals, deliver better performance, increase security, and support futuristic applications,” TIA said. The proposal duplicates work underway by standards bodies, “poses practical and technical challenges,” and “works against the multi-stakeholder approach to the Internet,” TIA said. “There is a concerning trend with respect to the ITU pursuing standards work outside of its mandate, which duplicates work being done in more appropriate fora,” Computer & Communications Industry Association commented: “Duplication can lead to fragmentation of the Internet and hinder further development of new technologies.” Streamline the number of technical ITU study groups, CCIA advised. ACT|The App Association also warned against more regulation. “While larger corporations may be more equipped to absorb the costs associated with unnecessary regulations and trade barriers to market access, small businesses that cannot afford these expenses are effectively excluded from these markets,” ACT said. Most proposals likely at WTSA aren’t “areas of expertise” and shouldn’t be on the agenda, the Information Technology Industry Council said: “ITI would not support the exploration of new study groups and instead supports the continued consolidation of study groups that are no longer relevant or duplicative.” WTSA-20 is "an opportunity for the U.S. government and our allies to ensure that the ITU does not expand its jurisdiction and remains focused on its existing mandate and core competencies,” the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said. NTIA sought comment in May (see 2005080023). WTSA-20 is scheduled for Hyderabad, India, Nov. 17-27.