FCC Lacks Authority to Expand Video Description to IP-Delivered Video, NAB Says

The FCC lacks authority to expand video description requirements to IP-delivered video and should be cautious about expanding the markets in which it's required, NAB commented, posted in docket 11-43 Tuesday. Comments are intended to inform an Oct. 8 report to Congress required of the agency by the 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act. Expanding requirements beyond the top 60 markets could be burdensome for broadcasters since revenue in such markets is lower, NAB said. “If the Internet is used to carry live terrestrial broadcast television, the Commission should have jurisdiction under the CVAA to regulate such program delivery systems,” the American Council for the Blind said. The FCC should establish a clear stance toward accessibility requirements as video and broadcast technologies evolve, the ACB said. It said the FCC should work with industry groups to create a centralized list of described programming. “Such a centralized list will also greatly assist in assuring that covered networks under the CVAA are meeting their required mandate of 87.5 quarterly hours of described content,” ACB said. ACB and NCTA raised concern over technical limitations of providing audio description over the secondary audio program channel, where it sometimes conflicts with foreign-language translations on legacy content. “Industry is aware of the interest in facilitating greater and easier access to video described programming to avoid conflicts with foreign language programming that may occupy this same audio stream, and is working to achieve that end,” NCTA said. “Cable operators are offering more than two audio streams where it is feasible.” The FCC should consider that proposed changes to kidvid rules could affect availability of described content, programmer Litton Entertainment said. Litton opposed FCC-proposed relaxation of kidvid requirements.