Healthcare, Alaska Groups Back RHC Fund Hike; Industry Focuses on Improving USF Program

Many stakeholders backed hiking USF rural health care program funding support, while industry parties focused more on improving RHC efficiency and oversight. Dozens of comments were filed at the FCC Monday and last week in docket 17-310 on an NPRM on possibly increasing the program's $400 million annual cap and creating a prioritization mechanism if demand exceeds the cap, among other potential changes. The Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition urged increasing the cap to $800 million to reflect that potential participating providers more than doubled since 1997 when the current cap began. The American Hospital Association said the cap should be "significantly increased to keep pace with growing connectivity demand." Other healthcare interests and Alaskan entities, including tribal groups, backed an increase, citing the need to at least account for inflation. The NPRM "overlooks the significantly greater need for support on a per-location basis in Alaska's rural areas than in the rest of the nation," said Alaska Communications. USTelecom shared some FCC concerns with how the RHC program has operated in the lower 48 states, where "cases of waste, fraud, or abuse have come to light." The commission should focus on helping Universal Service Administrative Co. "detect and reject applications where federal universal service support is not needed" to meet statutory proposes, the telco group said. NCTA supported the promotion of telehealth in rural America "based on evidentiary data with a principal focus on defined needs and desired outcomes." NTCA said the FCC should provide better guidance to applicants, including on the specificity needed to describe requests for service support. "Ensure that satellite broadband services are eligible to equitably compete" for such money, said the Satellite Industry Association.