Verizon Urges National Broadband Regime; OTI, Free Press Lobby; Copps Says FCC Ignores Public

Verizon urged the FCC to ensure a "national, light touch" broadband framework that promotes investment and innovation, and that isn't undermined by a "patchwork of contrary state or local regulation." Regulation of broadband access services should "recognize that these services are inherently interstate" in nature, said the telco, backing an "open Internet" and voicing concern about Communications Act Title II classification. "State-specific rules relating to these services simply don’t work when we are talking about services that freely cross state boundaries: a user may be in one state, but accessing content from a host in another state, while using a provider from yet a third," said a Verizon filing posted Thursday in docket 17-108 on meetings Monday with outgoing acting General Counsel Nick Degani (see personals section in this issue), Special Counsel Kristine Fargotstein and aides to Chairman Ajit Pai. The company said courts "consistently recognized" FCC authority to pre-empt state or local laws obstructing or conflicting with federal objectives. New America's Open Technology Institute and Free Press backed Title II and detailed the "flaws in the arguments offered by carriers, and adopted" in the recent NPRM proposing to reclassify broadband as Title I and revisit net neutrality regulation. Meeting with Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel and aides, OTI and Free Press cited "seeming irregularities in the commenting process and the Commission's approach," including regarding consumer complaints not included in the record. The FCC's Title II net neutrality order is popular and support is growing, but public support could make little difference, former Commissioner Michael Copps said in a speech at the Public Interest Advocacy Centre in Ottawa, Ontario. Copps is now at Common Cause, which provided a copy of his remarks. Copps warned against what he sees as the danger of increased broadcast consolidation, conceding mergers were also approved under the Obama administration. The FCC has launched “an assault” on the internet, he said. “On this issue, as on so many others, opinions inside the fabled Washington Beltway bear little resemblance to what most citizens are thinking,” Copps said. “Special interests and discredited ideology trump what citizens clearly want their communications ecosystem to look like. You know, net neutrality is such a no-brainer. I don’t believe it would even be an issue without the big money interests and the power they wield in our nation’s capital. But they have that power, so the future of net neutrality in the United States is under dire threat, from our FCC and possibly Congress, too.”