Consumer Electronics Daily was a Warren News publication.

Trade-Related Court Cases Filed for Week of May 15-21

May 23, 2017 by Brian Feito|Penalties and Courts

The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of May 15-21:

May Arts, challenging the final results of the Commerce Department's antidumping duty administrative review on narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge from Taiwan covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-110. Filed May 15.

Trelleborg Wheel Systems (Xingtai) Co. Ltd., challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on new pneumatic off-the-road tires from China covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-111. Filed May 15.

Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Wells Ltd., and Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (USA), challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on steel wire garment hangers from China covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-112. Filed May 15.

Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co., Ltd., challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on new pneumatic off-the-road tires from China covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-113. Filed May 16.

ILJIN Steel Corporation, challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on oil country tubular goods from South Korea covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-114. Filed May 16.

Worldwise, on the classification of pet carriers. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 4202.92.9026 (17.6%). Worldwise says it should have instead been classified under subheading 6307.90.9889 (7%). #17-115. Filed May 16

AJU Besteel Co., Ltd., challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on oil country tubular goods from South Korea covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-116. Filed May 16.

Tianjin United Tire & Rubber International Co., Ltd., challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on new pneumatic off-the-road tires from China covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-117. Filed May 16.

Maverick Tube Corporation, challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on oil country tubular goods from South Korea covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-118. Filed May 17.

SeAH Steel Corporation, challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on oil country tubular goods from South Korea covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-119. Filed May 17.

Titan Tire Corporation and the United Steelworkers Labor Union, challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on new pneumatic off-the-road tires from China covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-120. Filed May 18.

Zhejiang Quzhou Lianzhou Refrigerants Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Quhua Fluor-Chemistry Co., Ltd., challenging Commerce's final determination in the antidumping duty investigation on 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane from China. #17-121. Filed May 18.

Composite Technology International, on the classification of LVL engineered painted rails, stiles and blocks. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 4421.90.9780 (3.3%). Composite Technology says it should have instead been classified under subheading 4412.99.5100 (free) or 4412.99.9500 (free). #17-122. Filed May 19.

Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd., challenging the final results of Commerce's antidumping duty administrative review on new pneumatic off-the-road tires from China covering entries in 2014 and 2015. #17-123. Filed May 19.

Wilson Hunt Int'l Ltd., on the classification of men's and boys' knit shorts, shirts, sweaters and other apparel. CBP classified the merchandise under subheadings 6103.43.15 (28.2%), 6105.20.20 (32%), 6110.30.30 (32%) and 6114.30.30 (14.9%). Wilson Hunt says it should have instead been classified under subheading 9820.61.35 (free). #17-124. Filed May 19.

An anonymous corporation, challenging CBP's decision to give lever rule protection to Duracell trademarks by banning gray market imports. #17-125. Filed May 19.

​Appeals of CIT Decisions

No appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of May 15-21.