Trade-Related Court Cases Filed for Week of Oct. 31 - Nov. 6
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Oct. 31 - Nov. 6:
JFE Steel Corporation, challenging the final determination in Commerce's antidumping duty investigation on hot-rolled steel flat products from Japan. #16-00234. Filed Nov. 2.
Incase Design, on the classification of mini car chargers and high speed mini car chargers with a lightning to USB connector. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 8504.40.9550 (1.5%). Incase says it should have instead been classified under subheading 8504.40.8500 (free). #16-00235. Filed Nov. 2.
Incipio Technologies, on the classification of power banks for mobile phones. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 8507.60.0000 (3.4%). Incipio says it should have instead been classified under subheading 8504.40.8500 (free). #16-00236. Filed Nov. 2.
Nucor Corporation, challenging the final determination in Commerce's countervailing duty investigation on hot-rolled steel flat products from South Korea. #16-00237. Filed Nov. 2.
Hyundai Steel Company, challenging the final determination in Commerce's antidumping duty investigation on hot-rolled steel flat products from South Korea. #16-00238. Filed Nov. 2.
AK Steel Corporation, challenging the final determination in Commerce's antidumping duty investigation on hot-rolled steel flat products from the United Kingdom. #16-00239. Filed Nov. 2.
AK Steel Corporation, challenging the final determination in Commerce's antidumping duty investigation on hot-rolled steel flat products from the Netherlands. #16-00240. Filed Nov. 2.
United States, seeking a penalty of $87,740.60 for negligent violations of 19 USC 1592, and $33,901.88 in unpaid duties, from Deladiep, Incorporated, and John Delatorre for false statements on entry documentation and non-payment of antidumping and countervailing duties on their imports of raw flexible magnets from China. #15-00241. Filed Nov. 4.
Star Ace Asia Ltd., challenging CBP's valuation of its imported apparel. CBP valued the merchandise based on the post-importation selling price in the U.S. Star Ace says it should have been valued at the price paid or payable when sold for importation in the U.S. #15-00242. Filed Nov. 4.
​Appeals of CIT Decisions
No appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Oct. 31 - Nov. 6.