Internet governance stakeholders should be wary of a government-controlled...

Internet governance stakeholders should be wary of a government-controlled Internet, as the U.S. government transitions oversight of domain name functions to global stakeholders, said former FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell, now a visiting fellow at the Hudson Institute, in a Friday blog post (http://tinyurl.com/ldku43y). NTIA announced March 14 it was asking the global Internet community to create an oversight plan for the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). “If events don’t unfold as NTIA intends, however, Internet freedom, global prosperity and international political reform will be at risk,” McDowell said. If all goes according to plan, “existing, non-profit, private sector Internet governance groups [will] oversee ICANN’s management of these critical technical functions, just as they have other technical aspects of the Net for decades -- with a perfect track record of success,” McDowell said. “The worst case scenario would include foreign governments, either directly or through intergovernmental bodies, snatching the soon-to-be untethered technical functions for their own purposes.” McDowell pointed to foreign leaders such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has “plainly asserted” a goal to have international control of the Internet conducted by the United Nations. “This concern is more than theoretical,” McDowell said. “Countries such as China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran and their client states, have worked for years to absorb many aspects of Internet governance into multilateral organizations ... rather than the non-profit private sector."